HR.4061 - Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2009

Economy Education Environment Government Law Technology

To advance cybersecurity research, development, and technical standards, and for other purposes.

  • People's Vote NO

    Yes 0% No 100%
    3 Votes

  • Gov Vote YES

    Yes 99% No 1%
    427 Votes

  • Outcome

    Disagreement

  • Your Vote NONE

Bill Status

  • Introduced
    Nov-07-2009
  • Passed House
  • Passed Senate
  • President’s Desk
  • Bill is Law

Summary:

2/4/2010--Passed House amended. Cybersecurity Enhancement Act of 2010 - Title I: Research and Development - (Sec. 103) Directs specified federal agencies participating in the National High-Performance Computing Program to: (1) transmit to Congress a cybersecurity strategic research and development plan and triennial updates; and (2) develop and annually update an implementation roadmap for such plan. Specifies the plan's contents, including that it shall: (1) specify near-term, mid-term, and long-term Program research objectives; (2) describe how the Program will establish a national research infrastructure to create next generation networking and information technology systems; (3) outline how the United States can work (more)

Actions:

Feb 09 2010

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Feb 04 2010

The Clerk was authorized to correct section numbers, punctuation, and cross references, and to make other necessary technical and conforming corrections in the engrossment of H.R. 4061.

Feb 04 2010

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

Feb 04 2010

The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.

Feb 04 2010

The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. (text: CR 02/03/2010 H500-503)

Feb 04 2010

The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 4061.

Feb 04 2010

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings were postponed.

Feb 04 2010

Considered as unfinished business.

Feb 04 2010

The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.

Feb 03 2010

Mr. McGovern moved that the Committee rise.

Feb 03 2010

On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to without objection.

Feb 03 2010

Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 4061 as unfinished business.

Feb 03 2010

UNFINISHED BUSINESS - The Chair announced that the unfinished business was the question of adoption of amendments which had been debated earlier and on which further proceedings had been postponed.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Heinrich amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Owens amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Owens demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Owens amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lipinski amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kratovil amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kissell amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Kissell demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kissell amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Kilroy amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Kilroy demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kilroy amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Halvorson amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Halvorson demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Halvorson amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Connolly amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Connolly demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Connolly amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Bright amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Clarke amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Shea-Porter amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cuellar amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Cuellar demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cuellar amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Langevin amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Loretta Sanchez amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the McCarthy of New York amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Garamendi amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Dahlkemper amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Ms. Dahlkemper demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Dahlkemper amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Paulsen amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Edwards of Maryland amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Roskam amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Matheson amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Flake amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment and by voice vote, announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Gordon demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the question of adoption of the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Flake amendment.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Gordon amendment.

Feb 03 2010

POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment, the Chair put the question of adoption on the amendment and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Hastings (FL) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings on the amendment until later in the legislative day.

Feb 03 2010

DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 1051, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Hastings (FL) amendment.

Feb 03 2010

House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 1051 and Rule XVIII.

Feb 03 2010

The Speaker designated the Honorable Betty McCollum to act as Chairwoman of the Committee.

Feb 03 2010

GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 4061.

Feb 03 2010

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 1051.

Feb 03 2010

Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4061 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

Feb 03 2010

Rule H. Res. 1051 passed House.

Feb 02 2010

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 1051 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 4061 with 1 hour of general debate. Previous question shall be considered as ordered without intervening motions except motion to recommit with or without instructions. Measure will be considered read. Specified amendments are in order. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI.

Jan 27 2010

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Science and Technology. H. Rept. 111-405.

Nov 18 2009

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

Nov 07 2009

Referred to the House Committee on Science and Technology.

Unknown Date

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 422 - 5 (Roll no. 43).

Unknown Date

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 236.

Unknown Date

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.

Groups in favor

    No Groups in Favor

Groups in opposition

    No Groups in Opposition

Sponsored by

Rep. Daniel Lipinski (IL Democrat)

My Representatives: